Wednesday, May 28, 2008

GRAIN: somerville to portsmouth, trip (the light) fantastic

it's kind of a bummer that these are backwards, but oh well...


the romain lo mein.

crochet rocking out to my nano.

gump wondering where the party's at. seriously.

trees in portsmouth. they're so green!

arrival in portsmouth. our primary objective was achieved. actually, the primary goal was sustenance from the friendly toast.

nire's ready for 100 more.

alcatraz, new hampshire style.

crochet can't take ANYMORE of gump's "suggestions"

stealing the scene yet again at the portsmouth park & ride.



arrival in hampton. goofy gump grin #1.

cat eye. because leds are useless during the day.

cruising through the hampton beach traffic.

hampton friggin' beach.

route 1a continues.

the cape? no. hampton friggin' beach.

arrival in seabrook, nh. seabrook did not go for dean in 2004.

crossing the hampton bridge.

missing the party.

i nearly killed gump in the name of great typography.

uh, salem? no.

another town.

there i am, woefully unprepared for the adventure.

we had a guardian on our trip. thy name was gump.

i didn't quite have the hang of this cameraphone self-portrait thing yet.

almost getting lost in lynn. "i wouldn't trust 'i think i saw a sign.'"-gump. we did see a sign.

salem.


clif bars consumed: 7
nut & berry trail mix bags consumed: 1
commuter rail and/or T stops passed: 5? maybe 6?
nostalgic moments: 9
gumpisms heeded: 14
gumpisms ignored: 16
cost of normally relieving oneself in the unsubsidized state park bathrooms of new hampshire: $4
cost to us of relieving ourselves in the unsubsidized state park bathrooms of new hampshire: nothing.
technique: talking sweet nothings and solving their gnat problem.
total miles covered in the weekend: by me personally? 100+.

GRAIN: cut copy and stormy weather.


storm's a-comin'.

stop eating. or top eating, if the mailing sticker is to be believed.

hey! cut copy @ paradise.

cut copy @ paradise in different colors.

ominous.

not well executed photo of ominousness.

decordova sculture garden. these are sharks.

phatty over-exposures on the phone digicam.

rusty underbelly, which, coincidentally is the name of my new delta blues band.

the over-exposure gives it a sense of looking up from the depths of the sea. see? i could've been an art historian.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

ACADEMAGIC: what do blog commenters miss most about old new york?

The problem began with the following question: what do you miss most about old New York? The New York Times City Room blog asked the provocative question on its blog last week, resulting in a flurry of nostalgic answers (478 comments as of May 27th). The question is near and dear to many a New Yorker's heart, but ultimately I didn't have the patience to sift through a lot of the ramblings because ultimately I have about as much attention span for blog comments as I do for The Jerry Springer Show, which is to say not much (or so I thought).


So, I approached Tyler about an idea I had, which was a website that would be able to create tag clouds from any source text. Tag clouds, if you are unfamiliar with them, are aggregations of word counts in a given text, where each word is resized according to its frequency. They are commonly found on blogs to denote word frequency, or on social bookmarking sites such as del.icio.us (coincidentally, isn't it weird that del.icio.us doesn't own the domain http://www.icio.us/?). Tyler, being the guru that he is, promptly replied with tagcrowd.com, which is effectively the concept I had envisioned, albeit with much better execution.


Promptly, I took this new found information and plugged in my source text, and below was the result:

(Click on the image for a larger view)


Initially, I was totally befuddled by the apparent fondness that people had held for the old 23rd Street, until I realized that the blog posting was originally dated May 23rd, thus illuminating one of the limitations of using unfiltered tag clouds. Nevertheless, I'm intrigued by tag clouds as an analytical tool, albeit one that has to be used with a grain of salt.


As I learn more about the semantic web from Tyler, it's easy to see the difficulties and challenges we face in harnessing this information in a way that is useful and meaningful. It still takes a human mind to connect the fact that New Yorkers miss the West Village about as much as they miss the graffiti-filled subways of yore and old Times Square, but then again, there's no way of determining whether people were mentioning these examples as things that had gotten better or over time without reading through each of the entries.


-----


On a personal note, I have to say that I was a little disappointed by the lack of real surprises in this tag cloud, but maybe that is an argument in favor of finding the devil in the details. After all, I'd be more than a little shocked to find that people miss the old children's museum in the 50's on the West Side as much as I do, to say nothing of the days when Patsy Grimaldi still played Sinatra records at Grimaldi's Pizzeria and the wait was less than 45 minutes, or the fact that my parents and I were able to live on 37th Street and 8th avenue for less than it would cost to live in the South Bronx today. "Affordability" was a general term bandied about quite a bit, but it's vague enough that it's hard to fully grasp what it means. Then there were the trips to Fire Island as a kid...


Another issue is people's definitions of "old New York" seem to vary enough that there is no real concrete understanding of what it means. I find myself missing things about New York that I wasn't even alive to see, like Ebbets Field, the jazz age or the Harlem Renaissance, modernism, Woody Allen's upper east side, Coltrane or Bill Evans at the Vanguard (for God's sake you can hear the clinking of glasses in the background on those recordings), and I could go on and on. But these span the entire 20th century in New York, without even mentioning the days of the elevated train or horse-drawn carriages and farmland in Queens and uptown Manhattan.


I guess there is a lot to miss, but there is just as much to cherish now. New York is still the same cavernous mess I grew up in, constricted by a grid system it is just waiting to bust out of, to paraphrase Timothy "Speed" Levitch. I can't wait to spend my evenings cruising Broadway in the village at 1am, long past the hours when the tourists have bought their trinkets and the beautiful have retired their lofts to look up from the bottom of our little grand canyon and remember that nothing has really changed.

-----

UPDATE: Here's the actual text from the tag cloud:



created at TagCrowd.com


Sunday, May 18, 2008

atmospheric confluence in popular music



Bossa nova was a self-fulfilling prophecy; it was the new wave before there was new wave. It was, by definition, the in sound from way out, to paraphrase the Beastie Boys. Without irony, the French band Nouvelle Vague appropriated its formal theory without really understanding what it was all about, which is why nylon string guitars covering "Love Will Tear Us Apart" will only really be a temporary novelty and not a lasting testament to a time and place.

The irony of this could not be greater, since bossa nova was, at the time, the latest movement in the eternal history of love songs: love of place, history, culture, and most of all, love in all of its swooning yet lustful glory. That being said, bossa nova's crowning achievement isn't so much lyrical prowess, advanced harmonic usage (for popular music, at least), or successful stylistic synthesis (jazz + traditional Brazilian songwriting). Bossa nova's legacy is the palpable and visceral feeling one gets of a beach, a girl, grainy film, modernist apartment buildings on the waterfront, and fluttering hearts. Even the most cited criticisms of bossa nova as a movement acknowledge this power of image conjuring as fact, only to dismiss it as an incomplete view of Brazilian culture of the period at the hands of cultural imperialists, who took the saccharine aspects of samba and combined it with smooth sounds of Chet Baker or Gerry Mulligan.

It would be conjecture for me to try and understand why bossa nova is so palatably visceral. Maybe it was Black Orpheus, though I hadn't watched it until last year and didn't find it nearly as evocative as I would've hoped. Maybe it was old photographs of linen pants and aviator glasses, but again, I wouldn't make the connection until much later. As far as I can tell, the sound of Stan Getz's saxophone against the backdrop of João Gilberto's guitar is as ingrained an image as there can possibly be. It feels, almost objectively speaking, to be the voice of its time and place, a time and place I would have loved to have been a part of. Even if I understand, intellectually or even intuitively, that bossa nova was an incomplete rendering of Brazil in the 1950's and 1960's, I cannot help but be drawn into its cosmic romanticism, into a world devoid of conscious contrivances and comprised of organic bliss. When I listen to Caetano Veloso and Gal Costa's Domingo, the images are so clear that I can smell the sea salt. This must be what heaven is like.



It got me thinking of other perfect confluences of music and time that I have experienced. There is something to be said for the image of the Palace of Versailles that pops up anytime I listen to Mozart or even Bach. Whether it is historically accurate is a moot point; what I know to be true is decadent waltzes and a world still unperturbed by the annoyances of industrialism. Of course, what is hidden behind that is the oppression of early colonialism and the arrogance that comes with such blatant, forceful conquering, but again, that is a story for another day.



Acid jazz, eletronica, lounge and trip-hop all conjure up images of the contemporary urban landscape. As absent as these genres are from the American mainstream, their ubiquity in commercials has left a lasting impression on my imagination. It is impossible for me to hear Groove Armada, The Cinematic Orchestra, Portishead, Thievery Corporation and the like without thinking of being in a pretty nice sports car, traversing the almost post-apocalyptic empty urban landscape with four people that are presumably my friends. Maybe this is a bit commercially whorish of me, but frankly, I think it is more important to acknowledge these images than try to repress them as unrealistic, capitalist-induced fantasies that are the result of early indoctrination. At the very least, if I can articulate these images then maybe I can be more aware of the behind-the-scenes manipulations that created them in the first place. The soundtrack to a walk through my cavernous old stomping grounds of Greenwich Village late at night are usually accompanied by one or more of these groups.

Another genre that really manipulates emotionally is alt-country. When I listen to Wilco, Ryan Adams, Cat Power and even Calexico to a certain degree, it isn't hard to imagine a summer porch scene replete with mosquito tape, a neighborhood bar or a desert ranch alone in solidarity. Whether the imagery or the music came first is beyond me, but these are the images I have attached to them.



Strangely enough, while I was in Tucson for my friends' wedding a couple of years ago, I thought not only of Calexico, a hometown band whose soundscapes are as influenced by their surroundings as is possible, but Aaron Copeland, with whom I associate images of canyons, "wild west" frontier land and general Americana. That Americana is both used in reference to turn of the century landscape painting and bluegrass-influenced music is both strangely divergent and completely coherent. I suppose they differ only in the periods of time they depict.

One cultural artifact that synthesized the auditory and visual cues succinctly and coherently was the film Amelie. The film so perfectly illustrates the romanticized view of Paris so often conjured up by tourists and foreigners that the city is almost bound to be a letdown upon arrival. But like any great city, Paris deserves its reputation for being a city of romance and the line between cinematic perfection and urban landscape reality quickly erodes on a beautiful night walking around the Eiffel Tower while hearing the faint sounds of an accordion player.

To examine the genres that do not elicit such strong imagery for me is almost to show a history of genres I have fallen out of love with. Though I still carry a deep affection for jazz, the kind of jazz that moves me is drastically different than the music I used to (and still occasionally do) perform. It may speak to my lack of mastery of the saxophone, or it may speak to the development of my emotional maturity, but regardless, it took me several years after I stopped playing regularly to appreciate the beauty and thoughfulness of Nat "King" Cole, early Miles Davis and many others. To me, the idea that jazz could be not only emotional but evocative was foreign until after I put down the saxophone for some time. Now, when I listen to "Kind of Blue", I am awash with emotion and find myself sitting in an Eames chair next to a fireplace, wearing thick-rimmed beat glasses and a khaki jacket, an image so sublime it makes me want to re-enact it without pause.

It says something to me that a lot of indie rock fails to elicit this kind of emotional response. For me, indie rock is an exploration of energy levels and vicarious technical virtuosity (otherwise known as "air drumming/guitaring"). It is rare for an indie rock song or album to elicit this kind of emotional response for me. I think of indie rock as a focused channeling of energy more than an exploration of mood creation. But there are, of course, exceptions, even if I can't currently remember what they are.

Sorry if the post rambles quite a bit, but this exercise actually proved to be extremely cathartic. Music is such a powerful force that it can be easy to forget how it affects our day-to-day reality as well as our dream universe, but once in a while it's nice to stop and take stock.

------

Postscript:
The wonderful irony of the photos I have posted to accompany this piece is that not a single one of them really encapsulates the emotion or mood I discuss. Maybe it is innately impossible to capture this universe, but each one of the examples I mention above corresponds to such a visceral image that I find it impossible to believe that the image doesn't exist somewhere in non-imagined form.

------

Second Postscript:
What are some songs, artists, albums or genres that give you that real palpable, visceral sensation? There are plenty that I left out: Celtic and Acadian music, classical guitar, Cuban trova, afro-pop, etc. I'm curious to see what makes you guys tick.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

The ever-flowing streams of the Internet


So the great thing about the internet is that no matter how many links you click on, items you scroll through on Google Reader, pages you bookmark on delicious, videos you Digg, etc., you will always miss something that other people have known about for seconds, minutes, hours, days, months, years or beyond. The latest find from my old friend Kevin is The Perry Bible Fellowship, a hilariously dark collection of animated observations that I wholly consumed in one enterprising afternoon. I can't recommend it enough.

Monday, May 12, 2008

a post in three acts

"Hey! Long time no shit!" she said. Had she known the depths of my food poisoning the week before, she would've understood why I bit my tongue before saying, "You don't know the half of it!" Then again, she isn't psychic. 

- - - - - - - - - - 

I love the Batman movies. I don't love all of them unapologetically like some rampant comic dork that can somehow justify Uma Thurman's sexy librarian plant lady shtick or George Clooney's amplified nipples; I hate the bad ones just like everyone else. But the thing that I always loved the most about them was the way they depict Batman's drive home. Once he got to that magic point in Westchester/Princeton/Brooklyn(?!), public roads would give way to a gauntlet of trees and leaves as it is always Autumn in Gotham, literally and figuratively.



Something about that drive home must really define who Batman and/or Bruce Wayne is, since almost every big-screen iteration of Batman has made a point of spending a few minutes depicting what would otherwise be a benign event for any other person: the commute home. 

I always enjoy the last bit of my ride home late at night, when I roll up the last hill while the trees are still and the traffic is nil. It's my return-to-Wayne-Manor moment. 

- - - - - - - - - - 

DEAF JAM/GRAIN:

Cut Copy tonight was great. That is all. I was going to go on some rant about how I don't really understand cocaine usage, but sleep is more interesting at this point. 



Currently falling asleep to: Loose Fur. 

Sunday, May 11, 2008

HOLLOWPOINT: why you should get to know tyler kremberg



So, my online life partner and web guru (guru in the jazzmatazz/hip-hop way, not the lame monkish enlightenment way) has taken up the cause of why so many of us who are so intimately connected to the best of what the world wide web has to offer are so often dissatisfied with its intended or unintended effects. Actually, no he didn't; I just projected that onto his writing. But it's something that we grapple with all the time, and something that has yet to be meaningfully or substantially addressed.

We are still in the infant stages of fully grappling with the internet's sociological impacts. In spite of the great strides we have made with regards to communication (IM, blogging, RSS, media access, YouTube etc.), collaboration (wikis, shared documents, the symantic web, etc.) and information generation, dissemination, and retrieval (Google, JStor, etc.), sociological analysis of the web remains, paradigmatically-speaking, static. We discuss, with great regularity, the dangers of MySpace (which used to be the perils of the chatroom), the oxymoronic nature of technology in the workplace (not always a boon to efficiency), privacy and civil liberties, and the implications of pervasive or ubiquitous computing. But there are very few discussions of how the
web really seems to be affecting the vast majority of us for which the web provides some vital service that sits uncomfortably between over-occupied diversion and full-blown escape, and worse still, we have even fewer discussions on how to cope with this.

All we really know how to do is laugh at the codification of arbitrary interactions without really understanding how they affect our psyche: poor blog etiquette, the difference between facebook wall posts and private messages (to say nothing of pokes, superpokes, scrabulous games and instant messages), craigslist and ebay postings, among many more. But these interactions do not happen in an emotional vacuum. How do we really make sense of the impact that these interactions have on our real, physical day-to-day lives? And what do we do about it?

I think Tyler's point on the lack of anything that will ever supplant physical interaction is both self-evident and profoundly forgotten. While the internet, cellphones, voip and other services allow us to be more interconnected to our previous-life social circles than ever before, these devices only provide a rendering or sampling of what many of these relationships actually mean to us. Not only that, it can be almost damaging to devote too much time to maintaining these relationships at the cost of cultivating the relationships in our current physical lives. But more and more, services like facebook and gmail seek to monopolize more of our time while providing a narrower spectrum brand of social relationship maintenance in their current form. Is the answer more technology, or less?

My gut says less but recent historical anecdotes seem to prove otherwise. Has DVR really made me watch less TV or more? It's hard to say. On the one hand, I don't channel surf as much as I used to, but then again, without DVR maybe I'd be more discouraged from watching TV at all. Does having perpetual access to e-mail improve my ability to communicate with friends? To a degree, but maybe I'd be more inclined to be making those plans to fly out to visit them if it weren't so "easy" to keep in touch.

Well, all of this doesn't really change the fact that I've been promising Tyler a trip to Columbus for over a year now. He's been the most incredibly generous friend you could ask for, and if all he asks for in return is a trip to come visit, then it would be almost Spartan of me to decline. I could enumerate the reasons why Tyler has been so great, but maybe you should just actually get to know him. And if you already know Tyler, maybe you should call me up so we can figure out a weekend in the near future to hop on a plane and spend the weekend wandering Columbus, seeing the sites, and staying the fuck away from our little digital friends.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

i was home sick from work today...


So I worked on another poster. I was sort of inspired by watching helvetica, and though I slept through the middle part of the movie (thereby missing its most important lessons), I woke up toward the end and started thinking more about expressive design. This was a first crack at a more emotive flyer for my DJ night at Boston's savant project. I think it better reflects the vibe I'm doing for, and isn't quite so "designy" for design's sake. Instead, it's a bit more vintage, and does a better job of advertising the kind of event it is. Then again, it could just be my fever and nausea kicking in... excuse me... 

CASSETTENOVA: friday, may 9 at the savant project, 10pm on


the savant project: 1625 tremont st, boston, ma

IRREFUTABLE RANT: Why car-driving America is cyborg-fascism realized



Twice I was almost fucking hit today on my bicycle. TWICE. I have a 10-minute, 2.5 mile commute, and in those 600 seconds and 13,000 feet traversed, two FUCKING pricks almost ended my life. The first fucko ran a red light while accelerating, thereby forgoing his opportunity to pass "GO" and pick up $200, of course, and the second shitrag thought that yielding could take a backseat to the text message he was sending to a woman who was almost definitely his whorish mistress. The guy did manage to see me for a split second, but slowing down was too complicated of a process for him to understand, whereas "blowjob at the local Best Western from a transvestite named Tammi" was like adding and subtracting. To shitrag's credit, it is a terrible intersection replete with a three-way entrance, two of which are fairly blind. But that's generally why people SLOW THE FUCK DOWN.

So, it inspired me to lay down a theory of why these cyborg dickbots are going to kill us all. In no particular order of dystopian anger, here are my central tenets:

1| You're killing us all in this gas chamber of a crisis called "The Greenhouse Effect."

You know what? I'm not a rampant environmentalist. Sometimes I forgo bringing my ceramic plate down to the cafeteria and end up eating off of styrofoam. I question the value of recycling because I have read more than enough studies about the fact that it may do more harm than good. I eat meat, dairy, pork, and other planet-hating items as well, and I cannot afford to buy grass-fed items across the board. I think carbon neutrality is the only marketing gimmick solely created by the left, and that real climate change won't be prevented by buying offsets for my new H2.

But you know what? Fuck it. I bike to work EVERY DAY. In Boston?! Really?! Yup. And you know what? It's cold as balls in the winter, hot as fuck in the summer and somewhat rainy in between. I've earned my fair share of hamburgers and carbon off-sets by acknowledging that bicycles are a beautiful thing.

Of course, the benefits of biking are pretty well-publicized by now, but ultimately I didn't even start doing it for environmental benefit. I started because every single minute that I stood on the T platform, waiting for the next red line to appear was 10 minutes I would never get back. The greatest irony is that the T sucks for the same reason that biking is dangerous: too many people drive and thus no one wants to spend money on improving the infrastructure.

To veer back on track for a moment, this point was supposed to be about the exhaust pumping out of the noxious-fume outtake on your four-wheeled friend. So, uh, you know, stop killing me and you by putting all of this shit in the air. Thanks.

2| Cyborgs are here, and have been here since the Ford Model T

Arnold Schwarzenegger and Philip K. Dick made it seem like cyborgs were some far-off, distant, inherently-destructive pseudo-humanoids that lacked morality while maintaining a perfect figure. But having been a driver, and having been biking around drivers all the time, I would argue that the cyborg age is already here.

Many people already see their cars as an extension of their anima. They can accelerate themselves at incredible speeds over vast distances by doing little more than depressing their right foot (yet somehow parallel parking is cumbersome). They can listen to the music of their lives, catch up with old friends and transport the kids to and from soccer practice all at the same time, often exercising all options at the same time.

But when you witness the glazed look of a human being who has succumbed to a cell phone conversation and lazy afternoon drive, you catch a small glimmer of a future where everyones' eyes are a beady red and powered by a battery pack in your left ass pocket.

I'd be getting extreme if I started discussing how enslaved people who rely on their cars are, but fuck it, I was almost hit twice today and you only live once. What are you going to do when gas hits $10 a gallon and you have to choose between your last car and your first-born? Uh, don't answer that.

3| I don't have a #3, but things look better in threes. So, er, don't be a dick

That's all I've got. You know, I usually hate being angry and bitter because I think it is usually counter-productive, but those assholes had it coming. I just want to be able to ride my bike in peace. I just want to relegate my hostile experiences on a bicycle to the snarky looks I get from fixies and bike mechanics. Driving isn't wholly unreasonable. But you'd be surprised what the human body can withstand. Biking in the cold? Not that bad! Biking in the rain? Surprisingly refreshing. Biking long distances? Piece of cake! This isn't Colorado! The only hills are in Beacon Hill and JP, and JP has their fair share of bikers.

All of this being said, if anyone wants to drive up to Vermont anytime soon, let me know. I'm free, and I've got a bike ;)